But it?s an unsatisfactory account of why inequality has been rising in other occupations. The same pattern of income growth we?ve seen for the population as a whole has been replicated for virtually every subgroup that?s been studied. It holds for dentists, real-estate agents, authors, attorneys, newspaper columnists, musicians, and plastic surgeons. It holds for electrical engineers and English majors. And in none of those instances has it been primarily the result of regulatory favors.
To be sure, executives sometimes pack their boards with cronies who reward them with exorbitant salaries and bonuses. But such abuses are no worse now than they?ve always been. On the contrary, improved communications and falling transportation costs have almost certainly made them less serious. Executive hiring committees may not be perfectly informed, but they have more information than they used to, and this makes reputation a more effective predictor of performance. Similarly, increased vigilance from institutional shareholders and growing threats of hostile takeovers have placed additional constraints on executive pay abuse.
Despite these advances, corporate governance remains imperfect. But although there will always be cases in which mediocre executive performances are rewarded with high salaries, those who fail to deliver generally get the ax more quickly than in the past.
Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=43d6547fa55ac2d07d331c2ba279b992
occupy occupy midnight madness midnight madness john henry john henry zack greinke
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.